🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear the manager could survive a loss to lower-league opposition. He weathered an important continental showpiece against one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He withstood losing at home to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, laying waste to some of the club’s most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, calling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to tango. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight right-back in Blackburn’s championship 1994-95 season, Amorim came at the executive and seems to have missed. The most casual observer will notice the paradoxical situation: a manager who often railed his squad for losing individual battles crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of a the Premier League’s most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this whole bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been easy, based on his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to view him as little more than a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any demonstrable skill. How mistaken everyone was. In brilliantly outsmarting United’s feted manager, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, he has proved himself to be among football's true generals: a tactical intellect that the club's competitors are now justifiably concerned.

A Tactical Clash Regarding System and Philosophy

For example, this was the director who being involved in the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim originally, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas were resisted. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when issued from the mouth with the unimpeachable soccer background he possesses, a veteran of three England caps and a role in a championship team decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, without any penalty clause in place. The director seldom speaks publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – function on a plane exceeding our mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, probably all we would hear is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not quite equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it.

An Ultimate Power In Command

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the commands of his ultimate line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his preference for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to embrace data science and metrics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his minority ownership, he announced that the team's approach to football “will be determined by this group”.

After all, Sir Jim is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in industry and yachting. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, fundamentally superior. Who else would you trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a new stadium that looks a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Soccer Order: Directors Over Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously possible for a young, innovative manager with a philosophy and drive to join a club and see their vision through to completion. But how many companies have such individuals set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the tactics in the boardroom and hire someone who will adapt their methods to suit. If managers were formerly chefs, they have become more like delivery personnel: not creating the product, yet finally accountable should it be delivered cold or fails to meet standards.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become less about defining the vision and more about selling it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of literal children into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and essentially gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined while those individuals who appointed him live to blunder indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Football: Accountability for the Coaches

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply corporate governance at work: the rise of a privileged elite who can never be wrong, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose errors can invariably be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the system coach and then fire them for playing too much 3-4-3. Hire the process guy and then discard him for requiring excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for the latest player acquisitions, for the reality that the adults – however well qualified – remain in control.