🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.